peer review

Mon, 18 February 2019 - Peer review contextual study - KF

Peer review contextual study - KF

15 mins on one person - really be generous and question the writing - go deep, ask the questions - how, why, where? tell me the answer. find the parts that feel like a hurdle. the parts that challenge. make sure that what is being said is clear - not over complicated - know overarching comments that may be stumbling blocks.

Feedback FROM Rhoda -

After the making day - my description on the work I was doing and the fibres helped with Rhoda’s understanding of the 500 words

Performance of drawing - the recording of the drawing - the contrast of the time of working - the projection of the work on top of the finished piece - use the drawing and the programme to do it.

The last paragraph - the layering of the discussion and my practice- really tightly - reprition of   - the accuracy of the drawing so it looks like a print

My practice is integral to the writing - a

Add performance to the keywords as it is a performance -

The tactility of drawing and the fibres covered in a drawing - could they be collected - fibres really intrigued Rhodas thoughts and what was left behind- - what's left before - what left behind

Carbon paper - whats left behind- - really embedded in practice- the tactility and the performance are being enacted in the work I’m doing - a layering in the drawing the writing and the practice -

Keep the work narrow and not to broad - not as linked with the collisions but more linked with the tactility and the performance -

The speculative act of working and drawing - and know - how do we know - the layers of the work have now become the performance layered over the made - the making and the made -