contextual study

14.02.2020-22.02.2020 Progress for Group Critique Mon 24 Feb

I continue with the wax explorations, adding charcoal and graphite to the liquid parafin wax. The colour density is varied, the charcoal disperses completely with the liquid.

The graphite does not submit and settles on the bottom of the cast which then becomes the top surface when removed. As the wax becomes more diluted the graphite groups with its own kind.

img_1300.jpg

In preparation for the Group critique on Monday I have started to take rough images of the work in format, stacking the smaller tiles.

img_1190.jpg

I am intrigued by the volume of the works. I am also provoked by the distance the images give to the work.

img_1325.jpg

The distance between the materials is awkward. The last images portrays this in the arrangement as well. We know that if either pile becomes unstable it is likely to off balance the other, the materials colliding and probably fragmenting.

img_1597.jpg

Binding the materials does not add stability. The action of binding was in itself destabilising and complicated, placing the work in a compromised position.

I want to explore the mechanisms of binding the work, through the materials used (soft ribbons, rubber bands, bandages, paper, tape), and the operations such as punching holes to lace them together, spearing them, melting them, plastering the plaster ones together, binding them with twine while still soft or brittle.

TO DO:

Revisit old work and bind piles together (Using old work for prototyping makes more senses due to time constraints)

Reflectors and ring light. White and black paper roll for photos

White paint books and piles of accordion fold books - bind and stack - unfolded and closed

CONTEXTUAL STUDY

Working through mechanisms of creation and meaning and the need to hide the meaning from the audience to enable the operations to happen. Privacy and restrictions in a country of privacy. The restriction of person and personality. Silencing the work in the manner I silence my practice and my thoughts. What does it mean to withhold practice?

the relationship of operations of creating and consuming.

To bind, to control, to hold in, to scaffold, to contain, to conceal, to seal.

Distance of viewer and artist to work. Weight of artist visible, haptic inherent - viewer dissociation, an enforced segregation.

Exclusion

Occluded viewership

Artists to explore:

Charnel-Joseph H Boutros

Ryan gander

Monday, 4 Mar 2019 - Contextual study tutorial KF

Contextual Study tutorials - KF

When Monday, 4 Mar 2019

Reflections since the last tutorial

Too many keywords which reflects the broad and loose thinking - Materiality, Collision - movement, fragments, fractions, Repetition, Tactility, Defamiliarizing, Layering, Boundaries - constraint, containment, Consumption, Space - constraint, Visibility, Transparency, Binding, Drawing, Performances (added from Rhoda’s feedback)

Initial questions were: To what extent could collisions in drawing reflect materiality of practice? or How can the practice of drawing reflect the materiality of collision? -  these are uncomfortable and don’t feel like they are reflecting practice right now. They feel like an attempt to make something sound important or interesting to fulfil criteria which would make writing about them difficult and lacklustre.

Definitely need to provide definitions with the writing to clarify the viewpoint being examined and not allow for assumptions. Rhoda had asked for clarification of tactility, and Kimberley had discussed the notion of event and collision.

Through Testing Boundaries I am exploring the collision of making and made and producing work that brings these two together. layering them, in performance and documentation. Kimberley had provided the suggestion of Richards Serra’s Drawing as a verb. An addition from KF: this was an an example of how the action of art relates to the language that was discussed in the tutorial.

Rhoda had cited that she was clear on my thinking once she had seen the drawing in practice on the making day.

Discussion and recommendations

Keywords in discussion:

density, feeling the drawing, tactility, process, questioning accuracy, act of doing a drawing

questioning accuracy - criterion of drawing - what is a drawing, what is and isn't, ways to determine a drawing, the boundaries of making something by drawing that doesn’t represent a drawing.

Act of drawing - process - action or performance of drawing, act of making, about the maker - action of the mark - leads to….

… the significance of outcome - value of outcome - the performativity of drawing, action and it being viewed - define

focus more on the ACT than performance - understanding of the artist in the act, who is seeing it, who is it seeking out, is it the intentionality that makes it the work? or is it the product that makes it the work? an addition form KF: yes we discussed how performativity sits differently from the act of drawing and this is why we questioned how you were identifying the important focus of the drawing.

filming the layering, moving on of practice - Process on Process - staggering of process -

reflecting on process and being seen, understanding that it is all drawing, what drawing id?

2000 words - the so what? - a series of questions, how do I allow them to support my thinking? purpose of practice? clarify density.

scaffold with others thinking - ideology may be the same but practice is different, think about what you do know rather than what you don’t know.

me: Agnes Martin, Ellsworth Kelly ( I couldn’t think of any more which was frustrating as I’ve read so much!) (Susan Morris, Robert Morris, Kenneth Martin, John Latham, Joan Jonas)

Kimberley: Sol Lewitt, Richard Long, Tacita Dean - read the beginnings of the Vitamin D 1-2 books

In discussion these words came out: layer, pressure, embedding/mark, erasing - create a Venn diagram - how this impacts the practice.

Feeling a lot clearer after the discussion. excited to listen back to the tutorial as I know that will really help. I am looking forward to writing as I feel this will give me further clarity and confidence in having a ‘practice about practice’ and moving away from the overly conceptual aspects I was clinging uncomfortably on to.

Agreed actions (if any)

  • 10 keywords
  • 5 keywords
  • 3 questions for myself as possibilities to claim space
  • can drawing enable….
  • is it the physicality of drawing…..
  • this is what I am doing, this is what I’m interested in - land it in the practice
  • be specific as my practice is specific
  • email Kimberley in the next 3 weeks to check in that question is focused and working.

Thoughts the next day (after discussion with students regarding documenting work)

The act of drawing in a performative context or in a private and personal aspect. The initial; exploration began with the creation of a 'walked' drawing video. This process was repeated in a different location and a change of ground.

The viewing of the work being made at the time was unimportant and felt like a 'show' which was not the intention, the audience was initially enlisted as a support and to provide aids in filming and looking.

So to discuss the act of drawing as either performative or function based within the context of the practice, how the collision of made and making transforms the reading of the piece. How can they coexist? The beginnings are always separate, it is not possible for the made to preexist the making, the making always preexists the made. In juxtaposing them in film their space and time is collided and colluded. Visibly it appears as if the drawing is being traced, the ghostly shadow of a hand moves over the paper, the image becomes darker as the images conjoin in the making process.

I wish to explore further how the drawings will be read if the making is repetitively screened over the top, staggering the intervals of the videos. the possibility of misalignment, reflecting the impossibility of making and made being mutual and coexisting. How can this transfer of time and space conflict blur or transpose on the the viewers reading of the work.

Mon, 18 February 2019 - Peer review contextual study - KF

Peer review contextual study - KF

15 mins on one person - really be generous and question the writing - go deep, ask the questions - how, why, where? tell me the answer. find the parts that feel like a hurdle. the parts that challenge. make sure that what is being said is clear - not over complicated - know overarching comments that may be stumbling blocks.

Feedback FROM Rhoda -

After the making day - my description on the work I was doing and the fibres helped with Rhoda’s understanding of the 500 words

Performance of drawing - the recording of the drawing - the contrast of the time of working - the projection of the work on top of the finished piece - use the drawing and the programme to do it.

The last paragraph - the layering of the discussion and my practice- really tightly - reprition of   - the accuracy of the drawing so it looks like a print

My practice is integral to the writing - a

Add performance to the keywords as it is a performance -

The tactility of drawing and the fibres covered in a drawing - could they be collected - fibres really intrigued Rhodas thoughts and what was left behind- - what's left before - what left behind

Carbon paper - whats left behind- - really embedded in practice- the tactility and the performance are being enacted in the work I’m doing - a layering in the drawing the writing and the practice -

Keep the work narrow and not to broad - not as linked with the collisions but more linked with the tactility and the performance -

The speculative act of working and drawing - and know - how do we know - the layers of the work have now become the performance layered over the made - the making and the made -

Mon, 28 January 2019 - Writing workshop - CW and Karl Foster - CREATIVE WRITING

Writing workshop - CW and Karl F

Pre-workshop email exchange:

Questions from Karl Foster:

Where are you?

KVW: Lost. Time lost. Frustrated. Back to work this year and struggling with time management. I know it can be done, others are doing it but I’m troubled to find the right route. There is a need for words, tactility, movement, repetition, geometry, fracturing, collisions.

Where are the writing troubles?

KVW: Weeding through the research. Adding something new. Self-conscious of repetition or inadequate arguments. Inferiority complex. Loss of voice, or lack of voice, need to develop a voice. Authority - where is it and who has it? WHAT AM I GOING TO WRITE ABOUT! How do I maintain interest and passion? Do I want to give my passions to the task, will it rob them from me after scrutiny?

Where are the pleasures associated with writing through, about, or within practice?  

KVW: In practice: the pleasures are the release of writing. The satisfaction of rhythm and format on a page. The flow of a journey, both physical and psychological.

Through practice: the noting of a journey. Sketchbook time capsules capturing thoughts and progressions. Holding ideas for when they are ready. Gathering moments, instances, mundane information whose purpose is yet to be discovered.

About practice: the research, finding like-minded writers and researchers, but that's not really about writing, that's about reading.

How does writing help with practice?

KVW: Both clarifying and overloading, writing works its way through practice to strengthen it, as the foundations of a construction. Organizing the bricks into a structure that grows from a muddled pile. Sometimes the writing foundations' sprawl, confusing the practice structure, but further writing helps guide the foundations in the right manner. Context, direction, focus, plans, support.

How does practice help with writing?

KVW: I’m not sure it does yet! The writing is taking over, practice is falling by the wayside in the need for time and attention.

Introduction to the work of Francis Ponge. I read his piece 'rain' (https://www.poetryfoundation.org/), it's stunning. His ability to paint a picture with words is incredible, I closed my eyes and I felt like I was watching the rain with him. From this, I went on to explore the poetry society website and discovered their many podcasts which I am now devouring. 

Response from Karl Foster:

Thank you very much for your responses the the questions that I asked, and I am glad that you found the writing of Ponge interesting / useful.
I find the idea of writing as being a form or place for  'Holding ideas for when they are ready’ very interesting. This seems to account for one way of thinking about the importance of writing for visual or creative practice; another way of thinking about it is, perhaps, is as a way of accounting for ideas during or after ‘readiness'. I think ‘gathering’ is a good metaphor for the first use, it also looks like some of the practice-based images I have seen on your website - they look like gatherings of things - like murmurations. I think it is important to think about how words might help with the sorting and sifting of what has been gathered without it being an oppressive force. From my perspective, this is the interplay between the creative and the critical. By way of mitigating what is described by you as the negative effects of writing, I would suggest that you turn it continuously back to practice, give it a place alongside what you make, with the knowledge that it is one species of writing. It might also help to see the writing of others as material that you can use rather than something that is just read. If there are two species of writing here, how might you form hybrid that better serves your practice? Other people’s writing might provide a constructed matrix of anchor-points that enable you to exist in the centre of your visual making and thinking.

The session: slightly late due to a commitment.

Notes -

how do you define your territory?
making writing about and a part of practice rather than 'just a component to the course.
keywords that pop up over and over
what words keep coming up and 'flagging' up in your practice - defining your territory -

Form questions around this - How does, what does, why does?

Questions - in what ways might chance procedures increase the chances of not knowing in practice - 'happy accidencts"

Randomness - john cage - Fluxus - surrealism

negative capabilities - Keats

searching after fact and reason

what is important about not knowing? do we need some unknown entities? is art if it's fully known?

Resources:
google scholar
zotero - free software - organizing - popularise it with subjects and keywords - collecting references

The context around our making - a critical review of work but positioned in contemporary practice - what questions are you asking within your work - related to other writings, artists -
who what where when why how -

being 'with' something and establishing what is subjective and what is objective

Talk about excavating and digging the words from my practice - interestingly most people used water metaphors - diving in, immersion etc - Mine is about tactility, excavating, digging and movement - I mention flow once - am I an excavator, an archaeologist, a historian? a constructor laying foundations, a builder? a gatherer. a collector, treasure hunter? A  sorter, an organiser, a tidy-er.

consider the different types of writing I have produced - for uni, practice, pgce, etc

objectivity is hard to come by - we don't know and we only scratch the surface.

karen barad

the type of righting - 'circluar and the imagery they produce'

an account of what happened - a descriprtion of practice - of process - an uttereance of

an object as a stimulus for writing - a response - ithoughts map - gherasim luca -

protocol - use of dictation software - collecting thoughts - collecting research -- getting something wrong -

Karl plays a piece of work - the Prince of my fingers - its a spoken piece by a voice speaking the writing that was initially text that came from dictation. The rhythm and the process 0 the movement of the words, the speed was intense at times due to the punctuation and the length of words, them there were pauses. It took me on a visual and tactile journey though words, it felt familiar, how my own through work. how I speak and explain my work. How I explore, how I look, how I question. the internet was breaking it up, the chance encounter of the breaking and disruption of the sounds, changed the way we absorbed the piece, I question if we all experienced it differently. The volume, the connection, the speed, the sound quality, too much bass, not enough bass,

a higher degree of not knowing, and greater control in the process - writing from doing -

say what you are going to say, say it, say what you have said - introduction, main body, conclusion - start in the middle and work out - 2000 words - chop of the front and back - 1500, 2-3 point about practice - divide that in to 3 and its 500 words each point - thats not a lot!

stick to a plan, hold off for as long a s possible - introduce creative writing to evidence how it fits in practice - if the information is not supporting your argument it has no place to be there - you can construct the same argument in images - three images to tell the story - write out the images - of your practice or someone else practice - what do you want from the image? if you start from the introduction first you will result in a writing car crash COLLISION

argument? they to convince someone of something or of points that you've recognized - each pint - one quote for one pint - sometimes two - making sure things are relevant and not just for the sake of t - each paragraph need to add value - conclusion should identify what you have collected -

how do you frame the creative accept for what you are doing? can you think critically - not taking for granted - need to evidence your creativity -

quote at the beginning to anchor - no quote at the end as it will need to be unpacked and there is no room for that - writing in a way that suits you, don't fake it, not colloquial - but in a style that is familiar - finding the comfort -

SO WHAT? why is it important? - WHY?

reference Deleuze and Guattari - and that they are referenced so much ---- is it necessary -

be affected by the work - be respectful of the work as well - take responsibility for what you write - do it for your self to understand something of your self and your development - how can you separate your self

break

Karl discusses that things were are interested in will find a way in - he then references a previous students who spoke about the 'void' and referenced Balka's "how it is? instillation in the turbine hall - which made me smile as I can't let that go. the tactility and the experience has stayed so solidly with me - the opposite of the void that she spoke of - i looked for the concrete, the hard wall - the tactility of the soft velvet and its comfort -

do justice to a tiny object in our house

-pick an object and write about it-

you tarnish me,
my fingers are dirty, you dirty me
I'm dirty
you're soft in a hard form
you make marks, but not alone
you need me to make marks, you mark me


I need you to make marks

I inhale you, I don't want to but you are there,
In my breath,
uninvited,
tiny invasions
violations,
creeping into my orifices,
under my nails,
in the cracks of my skin,
on my skin

I need you,
I use you,
you use me to spread yourself,
I spread you,
you disseminate across the surface,
across me,
on to my skin.


Its dark,
you're dark,
you make me dark,
I use you lightly but you are still darker than the light,
I make you darker,
not darker than yourself,

You touch me, I touch you, we come together,
we collide,
I make a collision using you.
I use you

There is sound,
you are silent but your movement makes sound,
I move you to make sound,
you and I generate sound,
we generate,
generate sound, marks, dust, traces,
little traces of touch.
I no longer have you but you're still with me.
I see you.
I feel you.
you make me dirty.

I wash.


*compressed Charcoal*

I write about my relationship to things - to acts or objects - materiality - tactility - traces -

Share the words -

RT: its shape and its reach - its atomic mass and light and how it is perceived - reflection and refraction - travelling - stars and how light travels from the stars, how we see light and its distance.

Me: sensuality - touch -

metaphors we live by - a book - the fabric of writing

Bruno Latour -

What are the keywords from my writing? how do they fit in with my practice? have you googled the keyword as an academic term - epidemiology of the word -

reviews are not until 18th Feb - share before if we can - conversation that have happened to inform the writing and take it forward -

Contextual Essay - Wk 4 - 11/03/2018-17/03/2018

  • Week 4 Mar 11th Continue with reading, reflect immediately to stay on top and compare with each other and practice - make links, why is it relevant? - Mon 12 Mar: Tutorial AR  

  CONTEXTUAL ESSAY TUTORIAL FEEDBACK:draft title: ‘The Material Culture of Everyday Life, using materials to sway emotion and confine chaos’.Define terms – Sway – to have an affect.Looking at list of artists narrow down to four that are more pertinent: currently considering Kiyonori Shimada & Machiko Agano as aspiring practice regarding installation and immersion, Ealish Wilson & Liz Nilsson relating to current position of practice and made artifacts, shared concerns, 3D spaces in drawings/2D works etc.Address the question ‘why is it important to me?’ rather than being confessional as this is uncomfortable for me make it into an issue of contemporary life. What does the work do, or creating the work do? Calming impact, emotions and confining chaos through making.Structure: Draft titleIntro: why you want to look at it ‘it’s a contemporary issue’, data points (calming emotions and confining chaos)2: ‘I’m going to look at these two pairs of artists….’3: discuss how their work does what I/they say it does4: how it relates to my work OR bring my work in to the previous two sections5: impact on my work6: Conclusion – go back to title & intro – reiterate why its an important issue and summarize why they do what was asked.QUOTES: two good ones – from philosophy, news, research. 

Contextual Essay - Wk 3 - 04/03/2018-10/03/2018

  • Week 3 Mar 4th  Reflect on current production, note relationship to readings, narrow down to key artists/works/methods.

 Regarding the contextual study, I think I have a working title, 'The Material Culture of Everyday Life, using materials to sway emotion and confine chaos'. I've happily discovered Maxine Bristow ( www.maxinebristow.com), and from that the Transition and Influence archive by UCA (www.transitionandinfluenceprojects.com) which I'm currently working through. I've realised today that a big barrier I have here is self-confidence, a lot of the artists that are coming up are ones I researched during my BA and as I had quite a negative experience I'm finding it difficult to revisit them without evoking self-doubt. That's certainly a challenge I didn't anticipate!I'm reading and actually do feel like I'm making some progress but it's a little muddled and I'm jumping around with it as I rocket off in to my thoughts as I get excited, having to work at reigning it in to keep the process coherent. I'm doing my best to give myself a break and the frustration levels are going down, but it's all a process.Thoughts: What am I doing thats new? How am I bringing value? Am I getting my exploratory project and the contextual study mixed up. How can I write about my practice at the same time as being pushed to challenge it? It feels like contradictory to almost set a practice in a tangible form through a contextual pieces while being expected to push the boundaries of where the practice lies.On material culture: Our homes become more comfort driven and softer as our businesses and education centres become open, clinical and hard: glazing, concrete, enamel vs woods, wools and rattan.Material culture of everyday life, using materials to sway emotion - comfort, fear etc. Immersion, immersive new media and textiles, could they work together to give a comforting or challenging experience?Artists:Sue Lawty:

19sl Stone Drawing: Series 0414, Sue Lawtynatural stone on gesso, 6 panels, 10.5” x 8.25” each, 2010, $7,400 (SOLD)20sl Woven Lead: Series 1210, Sue Lawtylead warp and weft, hand woven and beaten, plexi, 10.5” x 8.25” each, 2010, $7,400

Statement:‘I seek an understated restraint, balance, tension, rhythm: an essential stillness.

The work is rooted in an emotional, spiritual and physical engagement with the land, drawing on direct experiences of remote, raw, edgy landscape and specifically rock. It has been described as ‘meditative… a deeply contemplative experience’.

Constructed pieces and drawings in two and three dimensions are abstract and minimal. They explore repetition and interval; investigating territories of expression in raphia, hemp, linen, lead, stone or shadow.

Sue Lawty

‘…Lawty is developing links between contemporary use of unconventional materials and traditional practice… Cultural and personal narrative is concerned with the substance of things, the nature of cloth; it’s structure and feel. She is exploring ideas of individuality and universality, a single thread within a piece of cloth, or a single stone on a beach made of millions of stones. The mapping of place and space, the structure of the landscape, the sense of time…’ 

Professor Lesley Millarhttp://www.browngrotta.com/Pages/lawty.phpChika Ohgi:

vague sense of distance (2009)vinyl, my family clothes

http://chikaohgi.com/works/sense_distance.html

I am looking at the interface between the space and the objects.I consider the space as important as my objects.This is why I am interested in the edges of objects.Each object has a very subtle boundary between the space and itself. So the objects integrate themselves into the space.

I keep making, not knowing the consequence of my actions.The answer for my questing will only be revealed when it is installed in a space.My installations are gradually revealed to the spectators by the passage of time.

Chika OHGI

https://lha.uow.edu.au/taem/artistsinresidence/UOW220670.htmlMachiko Agano:

Japanese master weaving artist and artisan Machiko Agano is known for her elaborately woven structures usually created to be installed in a specific space. Many of Agano’s works use translucent or neutral coloured materials to portray delicate natural emotions, and allow the characteristics of the surrounding space to penetrate and reflect the work.

https://trendland.com/machiko-agano-textural-installations/Kiyonori Shimada:

DIVISION - 2009 - W

http://www.miniartextil.it/artist.php?post_id=254&lang_id=1

Believing that cloth itself, by its very nature affects our emotions directly, he creates monumental installations of stitched layers cloth. White, or red, or earth coloured, the installations surround the viewer, move gently and echo primordial forms.

http://www.directdesign.co.uk/testDD/transition_gallery/kiyonorishimada.html#Division

50/50 : DIGITALLY PRINTED TYVEK AND VELLUM CIRCLES  42" x 42"

My work investigates pattern and its transformation through surface manipulation. Influenced by travel, architecture, the aesthetic traditions from Japan and the Arts and Crafts movement, my textile constructions showcase materiality using a variety of substrates and structural form created through a process of continual manipulation.

The printed surface is where the manipulation starts. Photography plays an essential yet subtle role in my work. I capture imagery from daily life, various cultures and architecture to create my digitally manipulated textiles.

Using techniques normally associated with fashion, such a pleating and smocking, I work meticulously by hand to create structure, which starts to morph the custom-made textile into new iterations. Once, again, I turn to the photographic process to rework the patterns and print the transformed textiles onto cloth before finally pleating and smocking into my textile constructions. This dialogue between architecture, patterns, photography and material is the fundamental thread throughout my work, honoring the time to create beautiful objects that endure.

http://ealishwilson.com/g6fw3pdujgja4bq3zqad5wohhdkoiwLiz Nilsson:

“To Capture Silence” - an exhibition by Joe Hogan and Liz Nilsson, at the Source Art Centre, Thurles, 4th December 2014 - 31st January 2015.
These new abstract printed tableaux in grey tones, make reference to both the construction of life and the construction of cloth, threads and lines that meet, connect and move on - like the human process.The work is strongly linear, evoking a natural pattern and conducive of thought through repetition.

Using her experience as an artist, designer, facilitator and curator, she fabricates site-specific collaborative projects which investigate the connection between place, space and belonging.

Liz also have a strong interest in visual rhythm, pattern and repetition. She incorporates print, tactile mark making, photography and drawing in her projects, concluding in installations, printed compositions and socially engaged projects.

http://liznilsson.com/silence

Rhiannon Williams:

my-loss-red-lineshttps://criticalcloth.wordpress.com/page/2/

Patchwork as Critical Practice: 'I describe my own work, somewhat provocatively, as "intellectual sewing" conducted in the manner of a critique. My methodology supports the agenda for integration of theory into practice, arriving at an interdisciplinary approach that promotes mutuality of theory with practice as a working model.'

https://criticalcloth.wordpress.com/

Repetition and time are key elements in the work of Rhiannon Williams. Patchwork cloths created from newspapers and the detritus of modern life are used to reveal and critique aspects of the way we live.

http://www.transitionandinfluenceprojects.com/gallery/rhiannonwilliams.htmlAlana Tyson:

Installation view Ruthin Craft Centre, Lining and thread, inflatable, sound. 2.5m x 4m x 3m, 2015

http://www.alanatyson.com/interior/4589307860

Alana Tyson’s work attempts to make sense of the world she inhabits. Identifying herself as an outsider, not just because she is an immigrant to the UK, Tyson keenly feels the friction of everyday life and the contradictions and hypocrisy of society. Dismayed by such platitudes as "that is how it has always been," her uncertain questioning takes the form of performance, sculpture and installation utilising found, altered and constructed elements.

http://www.transitionandinfluenceprojects.com/gallery/alanatyson.htmlMaxine Bristow:

COMPONENT CONFIGURATION 010914 - CH2 2LB, STUDIO SPACE, UNIVERSITY OF CHESTER 01.09.14 - 26.10.14. Shown within the main studio space at the University of Chester, this presentation of work was the outcome of a period of speculative studio enquiry during the summer vacation period in 2014.

I am an artist and academic who draws on the material and semantic conventions of textile; using these as a point of departure for an artistic practice that variously takes the form of wall based objects, sculpture and installation. My practice, research and teaching experience, however, extends beyond the specificity of textile and is concerned more broadly with a material sensibility within contemporary fine art practice. Of central concern is material agency and the affective dimension of the aesthetic experience. I am particularly interested in the way that a material aesthetic opens up our sensuously bound encounter with the world and how the affective intensity of this encounter opens up a productively indeterminate space where boundaries become blurred and meaning is unable to settle.

http://www.maxinebristow.com/about-1/ 

Contextual Essay - Wk 2 - 25/02/2018-03/03/2018

  • Week 2 Feb 25th Begin research reading and gathering, use Textile reader (Hemmings, 2012) and Everyday Reader (Highmore, 2002); texts related to touch, histories, colonialism, colour, routine, textile usage. Explore artists already working around my exploration. Mon 26 Feb: Writing Workshop

This week I realised I am trying to cover too many topic in my workThankfully I realised that now before I had embarked on a huge amount of research for the essay. After summarising myself fro the writing workshop and for a couple of application I am keeping my work simple - routine, repetition, disruption in an urban environment; how chaos interacts with the repetition of everyday life. Well, when I say simple I mean that it's not as diverse as it initially was by including socio cultural factors, race relations, post0colonialism etc... if an audience wants to see that in the work thats okay, but I'm going to leave it out of my own critique, for now anyway!So, I've since read through a couple of the essays in The Textile Reader, (Hemmings, 2012) regarding touch, everyday life in public spaces and fabric and usage. I will comment on them in a separate post once I have gathered my thoughts.To be honest this week has been overwhelming, the writing workshop went quickly and I felt somewhat put on the spot, this made me instantly loose confidence in my self as I didn't feel as grounded in my process as my course mates appear to be. The essay feels like its running at twice the speed of life and I can't keep up. I can't quite get my head around having a vague structure ready for next week. I am wondering if its me or the pacing of the course, the fact that all three assessed projects are started at the same time and running parallel feels crazy.